Motorola Tech Support

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Thursday, 21 August 2008

Does anybody really know what smartphone market share is?

Posted on 23:24 by Unknown
An article in Wired online this week had a chart showing US smartphone market share (link). The chart gave more detail than I've seen recently from other research companies, so I thought it was worth reproducing the data here:



The source is Nielsen Mobile, formerly Telephia. The interesting thing about them is that they do much of the service quality monitoring for the operators, so they have much more direct access to mobile usage information than folks like IDC and Canalys, the people usually quoted for smartphone share.

Wired was focused on Palm's loss of market share, which is indeed striking (but not exactly news). But take a look at the chart again; there are a couple of other items that I think are more newsworthy.

The first surprise is that Nielsen shows Apple in fourth place in smartphone share. That's wildly different from what Canalys, the source usually reported, has been saying (link). Here's how they compare for Q4 2007:




What in the world is going on here?

I'm not sure, but I have some guesses. Canalys doesn't directly measure market share, it receives self-reported shipment reports from the manufacturers and then adds them up. That means Canalys measures shipments into the channel rather than sales, and it depends on the hardware companies to be honest.

Riiiight.

Nielsen Mobile doesn't explain on its website exactly how it measures share, but apparently it's using a mix of survey results and the usage data it gathers from the operators (link). So its numbers should reflect current usage of phones rather than shipments. If Nielsen is measuring installed base share, rather than share of current sales, that might explain the difference. Although in that case, share should not be changing as fast as Nielsen shows. So I'm still confused.

If anybody can shed more light on the source of the difference, please post a comment. I've also asked Nielsen, and will let you know if I hear anything.

The conflict in the numbers underlines how ridiculously useless the publicly-available third party sales numbers are in the mobile phone market, and how little attention the press is paying to the inconsistencies. Apple's share varies from 8% to 28%, and no one even notices. Hey, we got a pretty chart and it confirms what we wanted to say, so don't ask questions.

If you want more information on the problems with mobile market share tracking, I wrote a detailed post here (link).

I said there were two newsworthy things about the Nielsen numbers. Can you spot the second one?

That's right, since the iPhone was released, RIM has been gaining share. So much for the folks who predicted at the launch of the iPhone that it was going to take the smartphone market away from RIM. Instead, at least in the first round of competition, we see what you'd expect from a segmented market -- RIM appeals to some customers, Apple appeals to a different group, and both companies do well.

I can't wait to see what the numbers will look like in six months, after the iPhone 3G has been out for a while. Although probably Canalys and Nielsen will still disagree wildly on what's happening.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in apple, RIM, smartphones | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Google Video: Is that all there is?
    Google's new video store seems to be up and running. I say "seems to be" because when I looked at it my first reaction was, ...
  • RIM's Pearl: Splendid hardware, unfinished software
    For me, the highlight of fall CTIA this year was that I finally got to play with a Pearl, RIM's latest smartphone. It has more media fe...
  • A new way to measure the popularity of the iPhone
    True story: Back when I was working at Apple, we received a report that there had been a burglary at a company that had a lot of Macintosh c...
  • "Social" as a Business Tool, and Richard Windsor Unchained
    I'd like to call your attention to two new information resources on the web. "Social" as a business tool.   First, my friend a...
  • Why Apple + RIM would be a bad idea
    Several days ago a financial analyst in Canada floated the idea that Apple and RIM might collaborate to create the merger of an iPod and a ...
  • What does Google want?
    I’ve been doing a lot of networking in the last couple of months, meeting new people and getting in touch with old friends and co-workers. I...
  • Mobile phones and navigation: I've seen this movie before
    Reuters published an article saying that navigation features are the hot new data function on mobile phones. News.com picked it up, and by...
  • Motorola Rokr: Instant Failure
    I did an online search today for the words “Rokr” and “failure” together in the same article. There were 49,700 hits. I don’t want to pic...
  • Look what's number one
    The image above was sent to me today by a former PalmSource colleague. Yes, that's a list of Amazon's best-selling consumer electron...
  • The river and the dam: CTIA and The Future of Web Apps
    I went to two conferences this week: the CTIA telephony conference in Los Angeles and The Future of Web Apps in San Francisco. It's al...

Categories

  • Adobe
  • Air
  • Amazon
  • android
  • Apollo
  • apple
  • applications
  • April 1
  • att
  • avatar
  • blackberry
  • cera
  • China
  • Chrome
  • clearwire
  • community
  • conference
  • content
  • convergence
  • ctia
  • design
  • developers
  • devices
  • digital chocolate
  • ebook
  • entertainment
  • eTel
  • foleo
  • GMR
  • google
  • HP
  • htc
  • IBM
  • influencers
  • info ecosystem
  • info pad
  • information overload
  • intel
  • internet
  • ipad
  • iphone
  • japan
  • kindle
  • linux
  • Logitech
  • metaplatform
  • Metro
  • microsoft
  • mobile
  • mobile data
  • mobilists
  • motorola
  • N95
  • nano
  • net neutrality
  • netbooks
  • new media
  • Nintendo
  • nokia
  • O'Reilly
  • O'Reilly TOC
  • operators
  • oqo
  • OS
  • Palm
  • PDF
  • platforms
  • Pre
  • PS3
  • psion
  • qualcomm
  • RIM
  • rubicon
  • samsung
  • search
  • security
  • semantic web
  • Silverlight
  • smartphone
  • smartphones
  • Sony
  • speech
  • sprint
  • symbian
  • tablet
  • traffic
  • treo
  • twitter
  • verizon
  • video
  • virtual reality
  • vista
  • web
  • Web 2.0 summit
  • web apps
  • webos
  • wimax
  • windows
  • Windows Mobile
  • yahoo
  • zekira

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (10)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (3)
  • ►  2012 (17)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (4)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  February (2)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2011 (28)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (7)
    • ►  June (4)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (4)
    • ►  February (7)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2010 (20)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (3)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  February (2)
    • ►  January (5)
  • ►  2009 (22)
    • ►  November (3)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (5)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (4)
  • ▼  2008 (32)
    • ►  December (4)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ▼  August (2)
      • Does anybody really know what smartphone market sh...
      • Only 10% of Japanese people know how to use all th...
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (3)
    • ►  May (3)
    • ►  April (3)
    • ►  March (7)
    • ►  February (4)
    • ►  January (3)
  • ►  2007 (61)
    • ►  November (8)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (5)
    • ►  August (4)
    • ►  July (4)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (4)
    • ►  April (5)
    • ►  March (10)
    • ►  February (6)
    • ►  January (12)
  • ►  2006 (73)
    • ►  December (7)
    • ►  November (4)
    • ►  October (7)
    • ►  September (6)
    • ►  August (4)
    • ►  July (4)
    • ►  June (7)
    • ►  May (5)
    • ►  April (8)
    • ►  March (6)
    • ►  February (6)
    • ►  January (9)
  • ►  2005 (22)
    • ►  December (9)
    • ►  November (6)
    • ►  October (7)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile